LeaseWeb是大牌IDC，不过价格也一向不是那么便宜，这不出了低端VPS，火速上个简单的测评结果给大家瞧瞧，测试环境：1核CPU，512M内存，40G硬盘，1000M端口，KVM。据网友反映，LeaseWeb的VPS只从购买了就没出过问题，就是说稳定性上面绝对是一流的，这也不枉他们的牌子。
CPU信息：
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2400.116
cache size : 4096 KB
——————————————————————————–
VMSTAT
procs ———–memory———- —swap– —–io—- -system– —-cpu—-
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 0 333732 10576 142044 0 0 30 448 24 22 0 0 99 1
—————————————————————————————————-
硬盘I/0
Classic Disk I/O test # 1 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest1 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.5211 s, 55.0 MB/s
I/O speed : 55.0 MB/s
Classic Disk I/O test # 2 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest2 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.0954 s, 53.4 MB/s
I/O speed : 53.4 MB/s
Classic Disk I/O test # 3 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest3 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.1414 s, 62.6 MB/s
I/O speed : 62.6 MB/s
Advance Disk I/O test # 1
(dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest4 bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync)
1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 18.0245 s, 59.6 MB/s
I/O speed : 59.6 MB/s
Advance Disk I/O test # 2
(dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest5 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.8548 s, 60.1 MB/s
I/O speed : 60.1 MB/s
————————————————————————-
I/O PING
IOPing results
IOPing I/O test ( ioping -c 10 . 2>&1 )
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=1 time=3.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=2 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=3 time=0.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=4 time=0.7 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=5 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=6 time=0.7 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=7 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=8 time=1.0 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=9 time=0.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=10 time=0.9 ms
— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
10 requests completed in 9013.2 ms, 882 iops, 3.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.7/1.1/3.9/0.9 ms
————————————————————
IOPing seek rate test ( ioping -RD . 2>&1 )
— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
4125 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 1549 iops, 6.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.6/52.3/1.2 ms
————————————————————
IOPing sequential test ( ioping -RL . 2>&1 )
— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
869 requests completed in 3001.2 ms, 299 iops, 74.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.8/3.3/61.3/3.4 ms
————————————————————
IOPing cached test ( ioping -RC . 2>&1 )
— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
38867 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 412220 iops, 1610.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms
网络下载：
Network download test # 1
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 38.2MB/s
Network download test # 2
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 52.4MB/s
Network download test # 3
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 64.1MB/s
Download from Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://atlanta1.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
Got 596KB/s
Download from Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://dallas1.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
Got 10.8MB/s
Download from Linode, Tokyo, JP (http://tokyo1.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin)
Got 5.12MB/s
Download from Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
Got 7.81MB/s
Download from OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Got 10.9MB/s
Download from SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
Got 9.06MB/s
Download from Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
Got 11.6MB/s
Download from iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
Got 4.03MB/s
Download from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA (http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin)
Got 12.4MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Singapore (http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 4.53MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 12.4MB/s
Download from Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 13.7MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 51.4MB/s
UB跑分
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: LeaseWeb-KVM512: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686 — #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
17:04:57 up 53 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.12, 0.09; runlevel 2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 18 2013 17:04:57 – 17:33:14
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16182408.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2805.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5458.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 757001.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 202113.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1533667.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1280836.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 321468.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21415.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6987.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 893.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1162880.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16182408.0 1386.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 5458.3 1269.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 757001.8 1911.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 202113.5 1221.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1533667.8 2644.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1280836.2 1029.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 321468.0 803.7
Process Creation 126.0 21415.3 1699.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6987.3 1647.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 893.4 1489.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1162880.4 775.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1252.0
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 18 2013 17:33:14 – 18:01:30
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16165477.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2811.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5429.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 770767.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 202402.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1571321.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1279444.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 322174.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21003.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6911.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 893.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1164152.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16165477.2 1385.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2811.4 511.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5429.9 1262.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 770767.5 1946.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 202402.8 1223.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1571321.9 2709.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1279444.7 1028.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 322174.9 805.4
Process Creation 126.0 21003.0 1666.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6911.5 1630.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 893.5 1489.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1164152.0 776.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1253.2
