测试时间10月17日凌晨一点开始对LFC进行测评，简单的看了下，整体说来性能一般，这可能与时间上的问题有关正是服务器使用高峰期。
CPU型号 [4核] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz | 频率:2000.000 | 二级缓存:15360 KB | Bogomips:4000.00 ×4
root@s1:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2000.000
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4000.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2000.000
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4000.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2000.000
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4000.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2000.000
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4000.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
内存：
root@s1:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 253692 kB
MemFree: 3680 kB
Buffers: 22720 kB
Cached: 186064 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 43316 kB
Inactive: 194664 kB
Active(anon): 15076 kB
Inactive(anon): 15276 kB
Active(file): 28240 kB
Inactive(file): 179388 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 253692 kB
LowFree: 3680 kB
SwapTotal: 262136 kB
SwapFree: 262136 kB
Dirty: 16 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 29200 kB
Mapped: 11308 kB
Shmem: 1152 kB
Slab: 8264 kB
SReclaimable: 5104 kB
SUnreclaim: 3160 kB
KernelStack: 672 kB
PageTables: 708 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 388980 kB
Committed_AS: 98168 kB
VmallocTotal: 598008 kB
VmallocUsed: 844 kB
VmallocChunk: 597016 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 262144 kB
DirectMap2M: 0 kB
DD硬盘I/O测试
root@s1:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.68346 s, 47.2 MB/s
下载测试：
–2012-10-16 01:18:09– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’
100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 14.2M/s in 6.8s
2012-10-16 01:18:16 (14.7 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
UBI整体跑分测试：
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: s1.gongyi.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 05:03:32 UTC 2011
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
00:16:51 up 1:03, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:16:51 – 00:44:49
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10932321.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1895.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1163.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 234370.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 60202.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 693669.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 377229.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 45395.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2093.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2823.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 797.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 378766.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10932321.9 936.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1895.8 344.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 1163.1 270.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 234370.5 591.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 60202.0 363.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 693669.5 1196.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 377229.3 303.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 45395.3 113.5
Process Creation 126.0 2093.5 166.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2823.3 665.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 797.4 1329.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 378766.7 252.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 418.3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:44:49 – 01:12:51
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39795431.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7496.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2735.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 243956.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 65188.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 866754.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1484160.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 138240.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3749.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6143.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 807.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1300660.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39795431.0 3410.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7496.1 1362.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2735.0 636.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 243956.0 616.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 65188.8 393.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 866754.9 1494.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1484160.4 1193.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 138240.0 345.6
Process Creation 126.0 3749.9 297.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6143.9 1449.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 807.8 1346.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1300660.2 867.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 882.3
